My View
Propaganda has
existed for about as long as civilization itself has. Alexander the Great allegedly
‘marketed’ himself as the embodiment of a living god in an attempt to justify
his conquests and terrorize his enemies. The real ‘Battle for people’s minds’,
however, didn’t begin until the early twentieth century, with communication technology
allowing propagandists to spread messages quickly and to a massive audience. New
propaganda techniques built on psychological manipulation were created in Nazi Germany
by the ministry of propaganda, and further refined by other nations during and
after World War 2. These techniques were quick to be adopted because of how
important it is for the state to have a unified and agreeable base. This
applies to all types of governmental systems, from illiberal (and in some cases
liberal) democracies to feudalistic monarchies. Unless most people agree that the
people who rule over them (whether they be kings or elected politicians) are
making just and sound decisions, revolution is inevitable. At least until you
add propaganda to the equation, in which case any form of injustice and
corruption can be justified.
In Hungary, Viktor
Orban uses a combination of negative and positive propaganda to skirt
corruption accusations. “Years ago, a high-ranking Fidesz politician, a
communications guy, told me the following: if we can make the voter see that
the opposition is just as corrupt as we are, in the end they won’t care about
who steals and how much. All they will care about is who does more for the
country, who is more patriotic. So, the strategy is crystal clear: let’s talk
about values and morals instead of corruption” (Panyi, 2020). By vilifying LGBT
people and immigrants under the pretense of upholding and protecting Christian values,
corruption has been allowed to run rampant. In addition to using negative
propaganda to attack opposing political parties and scapegoating innocent
people, Orban also likes to stir nationalistic fervor by romanticizing a
bygone Hungarian empire.
Democracy, which
comes from the Greek word ‘demokratia’, means “rule by the people”. Propaganda
is, by definition, antithetical to democracy. The people cannot be expected to
rule reasonably when they are being manipulated. One might make the argument
that propaganda is a necessary evil only during wartime, but that argument
falls like a house of cards when one deliberates on why people need to be lied
to and riled up emotionally to enlist in the first place. When people’s lives
are at stake, it is of paramount importance for the layman to think critically
about if/why war is necessary, and how much their elected officials have to
gain by starting one. By creating nationalistic propaganda, normal people can be
deluded into seeing war as a game, where doing whatever it takes to ‘win’ (like
systematic genocide) becomes their new normal. It would be naïve (and
ironically undemocratic) to suggest that all propaganda needs to be made
illegal overnight. If democracy is to have a chance in the twenty first century,
people need to be able to look for clues in the media they’re consuming and ask
themselves one question: Que Bono?
Sources used: BIRN. (2020, December 3). Corruption Couldn’t Shake Orban’s Credibility; a Sex Scandal Just Might. Balkan Insight. https://balkaninsight.com/2020/12/03/corruption-couldnt-shake-orbans-credibility-a-sex-scandal-just-might/
Hey Majd, I have to say that you really did choose a topic of massive importance. Many people nowadays belive that propaganda is a thing of the past in the western countries and is only present in the totalitarian regimes such as China (that you have mentioned in your Current events post). I can not stress enough how necessary it is for the pople to realise the fact that certain form of propaganda is blooming here in the West and that they learn how to fight it.
ReplyDeleteAwesome blog Majd, I particulary like the example you have used (Orban).
Daniel P.